".. His mind slid away into the labyrinthine world of
doublethink. To know and not to know, to be conscious
of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed
lies.. to forget, whatever it was necessary to forget, then
to draw it back into memory again at the moment
when it was needed, and then promptly to forget
it again, and above all, to apply the same process to the process
itself -- that was the ultimate subtlety: consciously to induce
unconsciousness, and then, once again, to become unconscious of the
act of hypnosis you had just performed. Even to understand the
word "doublethink" involved the use of doublethink."
(1984, George Orwell, p. 32,33)
In an effort to make the Watchtower appear more benign to
the public (especially in countries where the local government
are unfamiliar with the carefully- chosen language of authoritarian
religions), the Watchtower's Legal Department as well as their
rule-enforcing Service Department are promoting a new strategy.
The degree of "doublespeak" we have seen in the last few
months gives us a glimpse at this simple ruse. One is reminded of
Communism, where government is supposedly "by the people," and
all are accorded a "fair trial," yet in the end the outcome
can be predicted with almost 100% certainty. Any dissenter is
kicked out and shunned.
An example scenario would be: Brother Jones, who works along with other
elders in making sure Witnesses receive proper treatment at hospitals (known
as members of the Watchtower's Hospital Liaison Committees) reports
to Brooklyn that Sister Smith was in a car accident and
lost a lot of blood. Her husband, also a Jehovah's Witness, makes
the decision for her to accept blood, as she is unconscious
and is about to die. She receives a blood transfusion and lives through
the operation. Two weeks later she and her husband are
called before a committee of elders at the local
Kingdom Hall and asked why she was allowed to be given
blood. Select scriptures are read, and the Bible and Watchtower
logic are appealed to, citing the ban on receiving blood for Jehovah's
people. Sister Smith anguishes over the possibility of
being disfellowshipped for breaking God's law on blood, and the committee
decides not to disfellowship her, as she has a truly repentant attitude,
and also she was not the one who made the decision. Brother Smith, on the
other hand, knew that she had to have blood or die, and makes his case before
the elders. After the meeting, Brother Smith is told he will be disfellowshipped
for will fully breaking God's law.
In such a scenario, the Watch Tower Society can say that no one
is automatically disfellowshipped, which looks good to those on
the outside world. Yet in reality receiving a blood transfusion
is STILL A BIG SIN TO THE WATCHTOWER, and anyone not fully expressing
hatred and loathing for this act of sin WILL be disfellowshipped. So
nothing has really changed. The Watchtower is CORRECT
in saying that their doctrines regarding the Bible have not
changed. They are also correct in saying that no
one is automatically disfellowshipped. Some may have accidentally
broken the rules of the organization, and if they cry and show
enough remorse, they will simply be watched and given a
warning, or perhaps be stripped of certain responsibilities.
Yet if they broke the rules of the organization
WILLFULLY or even if it was an accident and they do not grovel before
the local elders, they WILL be disfellowshipped with virtually
no exception. Does this sound like free "choice"?
Actually, the bottom line in this system is obedience
to the leadership, the "faithful and discreet slave."
Note contents of a letter to all circuit and district overseers of
Jehovah's Witnesses as reproduced in the book Crisis of Conscience
by Raymond Franz:
Keep in mind that to be disfellowshipped, an apostate does not
have to be a promoter of apostate views. As mentioned in paragraph
two, page 17 of the August 1, 1980, Watchtower, "The word
'apostasy' comes from a Greek term that means `a standing away
from,' `a falling away, defection,' `rebellion, abandonment.'
Therefore, if a baptized Christian abandons the teachings
of Jehovah, as presented by the faithful and discreet
slave, and persists in believing other doctrine despite Scriptural
reproof, then he is apostatizing. Extended, kindly efforts should
be put forth to readjust his thinking. However, if, after such extended
efforts have been put forth to readjust his thinking, he continues
to believe the apostate ideas and rejects what he has been
provided through the `slave class,' then the appropriate judicial action
should be taken. (-quote from Crisis of Conscience, Second
Edition, pp 293).
Conformity of thought is the ultimate guideline. Yet much effort goes into convincing the rank-and-file that they are really operating under a system free of authoritarian mind control. (The Free Minds Journal, Fall 1998, p. 10)